Accountability Indicators

Chronic AbsenteeismChronic Absenteeism (K-12)

A student is defined as chronically absent if enrolled for a minimum of ten (10) days and absent for 10% or more of the days enrolled.  All absences (excused and unexcused) are used to make this determination. ESSA requires that each state select an accountability measurement (“indicator”), “of school quality or student success” under subsection 1111(c)(4)(B)(v)(I). Maine has chosen student attendance as its indicator to fulfill this requirement.

Background

Maine’s stakeholders reported that addressing chronic absenteeism is essential to ensuring student success. Establishing positive habits early regarding attendance is vital to long-term success. Research (4) illustrates a clear correlation between chronic absenteeism and achievement scores.

Academic Progress IconAcademic Progress

A school’s academic progress is defined as the comparison of individual student scores between the fall and spring administrations of the Maine Through-year Assessment (MTYA) or from one year to the next (alternate assessment), aggregated to the school level. ESSA requires that each state’s accountability system include an "other academic indicator"  under section 1111(c)(4)(B)(ii)(I) for its elementary and middle schools.  Maine has chosen academic progress as a measure of student growth as its indicator to fulfill this requirement.

Background

Each year students in grades three through eight are administered statewide assessments in both English language arts (ELA) and mathematics.  Every student who has been in the same district for two consecutive years (alternate assessment) or both the fall and spring administration of the Maine Through-Year Assessment (MTYA) will receive a progress score.  The progress data of all eligible students are added together and then divided by the number of eligible students.  The resulting number is the school indicator scores for ELA and math.

Progress in English Language Proficiency IconProgress in English Language Proficiency

Maine defines English language proficiency as sufficient skill in English to meaningfully access the curriculum. This indicator focuses on English learners and measures the progress they make toward English language proficiency each school year.  ESSA requires that each state include an indicator that gauges “progress in achieving English language proficiency as defined by the State and measured by the assessments described in subsection (b)(2)(G), within a State-determined timeline for all English learners”.

Background

English learners are students who have a primary or home language other than English and are in the process of learning English. Around 3% of Maine’s students are English learners, and their schools support them to learn English and succeed academically. They may receive English language support services inside or outside of their regular classes, programs specifically for English language development, or a variety of other supports. It usually takes 4-7 years for an English learner to become proficient in English, but this can vary depending on many factors. Each year English learners are administered ACCESS for ELLs, a test that measures a student’s ability to listen, speak, read, and write in English. A student’s overall score ranges from 1.0 to 6.0. In Maine, English language proficiency is defined as level 4.5, so the progress in English language proficiency indicator measures how much progress a student makes each year toward reaching level 4.5. A school’s score for progress in English language proficiency is based on the percentage of English learners at the school who have met their annual growth goals.

Academic Achievement in Math Icon

Academic Achievement

Within Maine’s assessment system, this accountability measurement (or indicator) is defined as the number of students scoring a level 3 or above. ESSA requires that each state’s accountability system include “academic achievement as measured by the number of students meeting state expectations on the annual assessments” required under subsection 1111 (b)(2)(B)(v)(I). 

Background

Maine administers the Academic Progress in English Language Arts IconMaine Educational Assessments (MEAs) annually to measure student performance in English language arts (ELA) and mathematics. Using the cut scores that have been established for these assessments, students earn a score ranging from 1 to 4.  The state has established the ambitious goal of improving the achievement of each student group by 20% by 2030.  With fidelity to that goal, each student group’s performance within a school will be used to calculate a school’s academic achievement level.

Graduation Rate IconGraduation Rate

ESSA requires that each state’s accountability system include “the four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate” and “the extended-year adjusted cohort graduation rate” (page 37 of ESSA). The adjusted cohort graduation rate (ACGR) is defined as, "A federally established formula to be used by each state and the District of Columbia representing the percentage of students from a particular cohort, graduating within four years of becoming first-time ninth (9th) graders.  Within Maine’s accountability system, the graduation rate indicator reflects the number of students graduating “on time” in Maine, as well as the graduating students who progressed at a different but acceptable rate.

Background

Achieving a high school diploma is a major accomplishment and marks a significant turning point in a student’s life. It is important to highlight the number of students achieving a high school diploma, whether it takes some students four years or longer to do so. The four-year rate is the number of students who graduate in four years with a high school diploma, divided by the number of students who form the adjusted cohort for the graduating class. The 5 and 6-year rates reflect the number of graduating students who took 5 and 6 years, respectively to graduate from high school.

Ambitious long-term goals were developed to reduce the percentage of non-graduating students in a five-step process to result in the student groups all meeting the goal of 90% by 2030.

The calculation process, for example, is as follows:

Student Group: All Students

  • Step 1: 2016 Graduation Rate = 86.83%
  • Step 2: 90% - 86.83% = 3.17%
  • Step 3: Differential for each 3-year step is 3.17 divided by 5 = .61%
  • Step 4: Add to the baseline .61 % and add the .61% to each subsequent step to reach the goal of 90% by 2030.

This calculation methodology is used for each of the student groups with the five-step differential based on the difference between 90% and the baseline % divided by 5 and added to the baseline and each subsequent step.

Goals for the Four-year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate

Subgroup Baseline (Data and Year) Long-term Goal (Data and Year) 2030
All Students 86.83% 2016 90% or maintain current 2016, whichever is greater, graduation percentages by 2030
Economically Disadvantaged Students 77.77% 2016
Students with Disabilities 72.19% 2016
English Learners 78.14% 2016
Race – Hispanic/Latino 83.46% 2016
Race – American Indian 84.91% 2016
Race – Asian 90.68 % 2016
Race – Black or African American 76.77% 2016
Race – Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 88.24% 2016
Race – Two or More Races 79.87% 2016
Race – White 87.29% 2016

 

The same methodology used above for the four-year cohort is used for the Extended Year Cohort Rate.

Ambitious long-term goals were developed to reduce the percentage of non-graduating students in a four-step process to result in all student groups meeting the goal of 92% by 2030. The calculation process, for example, is as follows:

Student Group: All Students

  • Step 1: 2016 Graduation Rate = 88.61%
  • Step 2: 92% - 88.61%= 3.39%
  • Step 3: Differential for each 3-year step is 3.39 divided by 5 = .678%
  • Step 4: Add to the baseline .678% and add the .678% to each subsequent step to reach the goal of 92% by 2030.

This calculation methodology is used for each of the student groups with the five-step differential based on the difference between 92% and the baseline % divided by 5 and added to the baseline and each subsequent step.

Goals for Extended-year Cohort Graduation Rates

Subgroup Baseline (Data and Year) Long-term Goal (Data and Year) 2030
All Students 89.11% 2016 92% or maintain current 2016, whichever is greater,  graduation percentages by 2030
Economically Disadvantaged Students 81.55% 2016
Students with Disabilities 78.96% 2016
English Learners 86.81% 2016
Asian 94.03% 2016
American Indian 86.27% 2016
Black 83.99% 2016
Hispanic 84.75% 2016
Native Hawaiian 91.67% 2016
Two or More Races 83.82% 2016
White 89.43% 2016