Maine Unemployment Rate 3.8 Percent in December Bookmark and Share

January 24, 2017

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 24, 2017 Contact: Glenn Mills 207-621-5192

The Maine Department of Labor, in conjunction with the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, released December workforce estimates for Maine.

Seasonally Adjusted Statewide Data Household Survey Estimates – The preliminary seasonally adjusted unemployment rate of 3.8 percent was down slightly from 4.0 percent in November and 4.1 percent one year ago. The number of unemployed was down 900 over the year to 26,200.

The U.S. preliminary unemployment rate of 4.7 percent was little changed from 4.6 percent in November and down from 5.0 percent one year ago.

The employment to population ratio estimate of 61 percent remained above the U.S. average of 59.7 percent.

The New England unemployment rate averaged 3.5 percent. Rates for other states were 2.6 percent in New Hampshire, 3.1 percent in Vermont, 2.8 percent in Massachusetts, 5.0 percent in Rhode Island, and 4.4 percent in Connecticut.

Labor force and unemployment data is available at .

Payroll Survey Estimates – The preliminary nonfarm payroll jobs estimate of 610,900 for December was unchanged from one year ago.

Nonfarm payroll jobs data is available at .

Not Seasonally Adjusted Substate Data The not seasonally adjusted statewide unemployment rate estimate of 3.5 percent for December was down from 3.9 percent one year ago. Rates ranged from 2.6 percent in Cumberland County to 5.5 percent in Somerset County. Rates tended to be lower than the statewide average in southern and central counties and higher than average in northern and rim counties.

The unemployment rate was below the statewide average in all three metro areas: Portland-South Portland (2.6 percent), Lewiston-Auburn (3.0 percent), and Bangor (3.3 percent).

Due to annual data revisions, release of January estimates will be delayed until Monday, March 13 (Data Release Schedule: ).

This release is available at .


  1. Preliminary labor force estimates, including rates (labor force participation, employment, and unemployment rates), and levels (labor force, employed, and unemployed) tend to move in a direction for several months and then reverse course. Those directional trends are largely driven by a smoothing procedure and may not indicate a change in underlying workforce conditions. Annual revisions (published in March each year) tend to moderate or eliminate those directional patterns.

  2. The 90 percent confidence interval for statewide unemployment rates in 2016 is 0.7 percentage points above or below the published estimate each month.

  3. To assess employment growth, we recommend looking at nonfarm jobs from the payroll survey rather than resident employment from the household survey. The payroll survey is larger, has smaller margins of error, and is subject to smaller revisions. More on the differences in accuracy of the two measures is at

  4. Nonfarm payroll jobs estimates tend to be volatile from month to month because there is variability in the sample of reporting employers and their representativeness for the universe of all employers. Additionally, seasonal adjustment is imperfect because weather, the beginning and ending of school semesters and holidays, and other events do not always occur with the same timing, which can exacerbate monthly volatility. Users should look to the trend over multiple months rather than the change from one specific month to another. Estimates for the period from October 2015 to September 2016 will be replaced with actual payroll data in March 2017. Those benchmark revisions are likely to show less volatility than preliminary estimates.