Skip Maine state header navigation
INFORMATIONAL LETTER NO. 82
POLICY CODE: IL/IHAJ
TO: Superintendents of Schools
FROM: Susan A. Gendron, Commissioner
DATE: February 17, 2004
RE: Follow-up on Information Requests from MSSA Critical Issues Forum
A number of
questions arose during the presentations and follow-up conversations at last
Thursday's event. I have asked DOE
staff to collect several documents that address the questions. You may access the documents in PDF format
at the links below. They include: the response from USDOE to Utah's request
for clarification on implications of opting to not accept NCLB funds; a CCSSO
analysis of the USDOE response; a clarification of the Title I funding
implications if the census model USDOE proposes to use is in fact employed next
year; and the Commissioner's statement to the Education Committee on Senator
Brennan's bill on NCLB
(LD 1716), and a set of talking points on the
high school laptop proposal.
I wish to thank all of you who attended for
the spirited and informative dialogue during the day. I am also grateful to the leadership and staff from MSSA who did
such a splendid job with organizing the day.
You can imagine, I trust, how grateful I am for your support and
enthusiasm for the MLTI high school proposal.
I will be updating the Education Committee soon on the Revolving
Renovation Fund status to respond to their concerns about the availability of
funds to support existing requests. As I stated on Thursday, I ask that you
contact your legislators to express your support for this approach in year 1
and the plan I shared with you for the remaining years. Your voices are among the most important for
them to hear at this juncture!
Attachments:
Education Response to Utah Regarding Participation in NCLB
CCSSO Analysis of the U.S. DOE response
How is Title I funding allocated?
Commissioner's Statement to Education Committee on LD 1716