Skip Maine state header navigation
INFORMATIONAL
LETTER NO. 76
POLICY
CODE: ILBA
To: Superintendents and Curriculum Coordinators
From: Susan A.
Gendron, Commissioner of Education
Date: May 14,
2003
Re:
Additional
Clarification on “Proposed Criteria and Guidelines for Adoption of Local
Assessment Systems in Compliance with Chapter 127”
On May 3rd I forwarded to you Informational
Letter #66, which was intended to communicate important preliminary steps the
Department is engaged in to complete work on the most recent set of technical
guidelines submitted to me by our local assessment system contractors. In that letter I stated, “In order to make
every effort to ensure that the document is clear and helpful, DOE staff have
begun a series of critical review sessions…Then on May 9th a joint
meeting of the Policy Advisory Committee, the Technical Advisory Committee, and
our local assessment contractors will synthesize the feedback and prepare the
final draft of the report for review and approval by me.”
Now that the document, titled “Proposed Criteria and
Guidelines for Adoption of Local Assessment Systems in Compliance with Chapter
127,” has been under discussion as stated in the previous informational letter-and
no doubt discussed more broadly at the local level-it is becoming clear from
the feedback the Department is receiving that many local educators believe that
the draft version of the report is in fact a completed document. We knew that the benefits of these
additional opportunities for review and comment by practitioners-which have
been extremely helpful-might be offset by the risk of such
confusion. I reiterate that the
current version of the document is a draft.
After our first round of feedback from a small group of curriculum
coordinators, many substantive as well as formatting changes were made. We anticipate that additional changes will
be made as we continue our review of feedback and consider broader policy
implications. Please do not take any
steps to implement these guidelines based on this draft version of the document. Our working assumption is that we will get
the final draft out to districts prior to our summer assessment system design
institutes, but much work and discussion remains to be accomplished.
To those of you who have commented on technical report, we
appreciate your taking time to do so.
We will make every effort to ensure the comments are incorporated fully
in our review of the document.
On another subject addressed briefly in Informational Letter #66, let me remind you that the Policy Advisory Committee hopes to complete work on the review of MEA cut scores in the very near future. This task has a number of important implications for AYP decisions and for local assessment system standard setting. You can be certain that this work; too, will be moving forward as rapidly as humanly possible.