Skip Maine state header navigation
Policy Code: IL
To: Superintendents,
Principals, School Board Chairs, Deans of the Colleges of Education
From: J. Duke Albanese, Commissioner
Date: September 6, 2000
Subject: Comprehensive Assessment System
Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) Recommendations and Follow-up Measures
The 1996
legislation enacting the Learning Results established that student
achievement should be assessed using a combination of state and local
measures. Subsequent policy guidance,
including a statement of broad purposes of a comprehensive assessment system,
was developed by the Assessment Design Team in 1997. Continuing analysis of assessment-related issues for Maine
schools is provided by both the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and the
Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) of the Comprehensive Assessment System. Both committees have engaged in highly
productive work over the past year that has the potential to inform state and
local actions for years to come. The
primary purpose of this letter is to update you on a series of recommendations
forwarded to me at the end of PAC’s first year of discussions.
Based on a review of the Learning
Results statute, the Assessment Design Team report, and the combined
experiences of PAC members, the committee articulated early in its work a set
of beliefs about assessment that guided the committee’s work for the remainder
of the year. Several key areas of
belief involve the state and local partnership in developing the comprehensive
assessment system, the appropriate balance of state and local assessment
measures, and the importance of building local capacity in developing and using
assessments. PAC’s recommendations
around current and emerging policy issues connect closely to these belief
areas:
§
PAC recommends that the MEA not be expanded beyond
its current scope. Assessments in
the content areas not currently represented on the MEA would—according to PAC’s
recommendation— be developed by the state, administered and scored at the local
level, and aggregated and reported by the state.
§
PAC also recommends that an extensive Request for
Proposals (RFP) be developed and funded, under which two categories of work
would be conducted: development,
dissemination, and technical assistance in the application of models for local
assessment systems (including samples of various assessment types in all eight
content areas); and development and training in the use of assessments in the
content areas not currently on the MEA.
This development
work must be preceded by clarifying
the necessary elements of a local assessment system, and determining the
necessary and sufficient evidence required to certify achievement of the Learning
Results for an individual student.
These recommendations will be
addressed in the comprehensive review of all Learning Results implementation
policy that is currently underway and which will culminate in an omnibus bill
to be submitted in the upcoming legislative session. As we look ahead to this important opportunity to clarify Learning
Results implementation, local assessment is among our highest
priorities. In addition to state and
federal funds available to begin this work, a grant from the LAB at Brown
University will be used to help us focus on the requirements for certifying achievement
of the Learning Results.
The
Department will continue to provide technical assistance and professional
development in the area of local assessment.
The following initiatives are some of the most important examples:
Your DOE contact for matters related to local assessment is Pam Rolfe, Local Assessment Coordinator, 287-5924 or pam.rolfe@state.me.us.