DRAFT; NOT AGENCY OR ADMINISTRATION POLICY
12.4.07
Side-by-Side Comparison of Straw Proposals
Note: Matters on which the proposals differ are italicized
|
New Statewide Siting Authority (former Straw Proposal 3) |
DEP permitting in all places where wind power an allowable use (former Straw Proposal 4) |
|
|
Decision-makers |
New Wind Power Siting Authority - statewide permitting authority (PUC chair and 2 public members) LURC - designates areas where wind power is a permitted use; interim approach pending zoning revision - Director determines land use compatibility |
DEP - statewide permitting authority, including LURC zones where wind power is an allowable use LURC - designates areas where wind power is a permitted use; interim approach pending zoning revision - Director determines land use compatibility ; permitting authority when rezoning required; interim approach pending zoning revision |
|
Staff; major agency roles |
PUC - coordination of permit review; proposed findings on energy issues LURC - zoning/land use compatibility DEP - review, analysis and proposed findings on environmental issues DIFW- MESA DIFW, DMR (coastal), DOC, LURC- review agencies with intervenor status Existing staff; applicant-funded consulting services as needed |
DEP - lead agency on permitting Under this proposal, LURC would retain its current authority to issue development permits when rezoning is required process and environmental analysis LURC - zoning/land use compatibility PUC - review agency re: energy related public benefits DIFW- MESA DIFW, DMR (coastal), DOC, LURC- review agencies Existing staff; applicant-funded consulting services as needed |
|
Approval standards |
New statewide statute - Clear approval requirements regarding natural resources effects that address impacts specifically associated with wind power; provision for decommissioning and mitigation of project-related impacts The Task Force has discussed different options regarding the nature and scope of mitigation. Options A&B as described on page 3 would allow full consideration of mitigation proposals. Under Option C consideration of mitigation would be limited to impacts on wetlands, vernal pools, and certain shorebirds. LURC zoning/land use compatibility |
Amendment of existing laws (e.g., Site Law) to ensure clear approval requirements regarding natural resources effects that address impacts specifically associated with wind power; provision for decommissioning See fn 2
LURC zoning/land use compatibility |
|
Consideration of public benefits |
Determination that project advantages exceed direct and cumulative adverse effects required; project-related benefits considered as follows: Option A - Public benefits as a whole (economic development, renewable energy and environmental including mitigation) considered under holistic public interest test; or Option B - Unified environmental-renewable energy criterion assessing environmental and renewable energy related benefits (not economic development), including proposed mitigation |
Option C- Reductions in CO2 and other air pollutants element of determination of "fits harmoniously"/unreasonable impact criterion in Site Law and other pertinent laws |
|
Process overview |
Authority makes permit consolidated state decision/185 days timeframe If no hearing, decision on agency record, based on staff's recommended findings Adjudicatory hearing (PUC rules and staff) (discretionary) Q: Longer timeframe for contested cases? |
DEP Commissioner makes consolidated state permit decision based on agency record and draft permit prepared by staff/180 timeframe BEP may assume jurisdiction as under current law (discretionary) LURC (not DEP) development permit required if rezoning DEP and LURC harmonize administrative practices and procedures Q: Longer timeframe for contested cases? |
|
LURC zoning |
If the project is in zone where wind power allowable use - Independent Siting Authority approval alone required Project in zone where wind not allowable use - rezoning under current law required in addition to permit from Authority |
Project in zone where wind power allowable use - DEP permit alone required Project in zone where wind not allowable use - rezoning and LURC development permit under current law required |
|
Costs |
State costs covered with application fees; start up appropriation (repaid with fees) for public members |
State costs covered with application fees |