Skip Maine state header navigation
Norman G.
Trask, Esq.
Currier & Trask
505 Main St
Presque Isle
ME 04769
Paul H.
Sighinolfi, Esq.
Rudman & Winchell
PO Box 1401
Bangor
ME 04402-1401
Mail Date: MAY 08 2007
WCB Case Nos.: 98-013262C DOIs:
08/04/1998
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Any
party in interest may request an appeal to the Maine Law Court by filing a copy
of this decision with the clerk of the Law Court within 20 days of receipt of
this decision, and by filing a petition seeking appellate review with the Law
Court within 20 days thereafter. See 39-A
M.R.S.A. Section 322.
Pursuant
to Board Rule Chapter 12 Section 19, all evidence and transcripts in this
matter may be destroyed after 60 days unless (1) we receive written
notification that one or both parties wish to have their exhibits returned to
them, or (2) a petition for appellate review is filed. The 60 days will not begin to run until all
post-decree motions have been decided or otherwise disposed.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Ghislain J. Levesque
(Employee)
v.
Fraser Paper, Ltd.
(Employer)
and
Sedgwick James of Northern New England
(Insurer)
BEFORE: Dionne, Chair; and Hiltz, Koocher, Mingo, &
Monfiletto, Directors
Pending before the Board is a
Petition For Extension of Benefits Pursuant to 39-A
M.R.S.A. § 213(1).
A hearing was held on April 24, 2007,
during which the employee testified as the sole witness. Also admitted into evidence were Employee
Exhibits 1-4, 6and 7.
Deliberations were conducted at the
conclusion of the hearing on April 24, 2007, and a decision was reached at the
end of those deliberations.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
1. The
employee sustained an August 4, 1998 low back injury. The employee had two surgeries as a result of
his injury.
2. Following
the second surgery, the employee returned to work for the employer.
3. Due
to restrictions from his work-related injury, the employee received partial
incapacity benefits of $171.86 per week.
4. Pursuant
to an August 31, 2006 decree, a Board Hearing Officer determined that the
employer could cease paying partial incapacity benefits.
5. In
December of 2006, the employee was terminated from his job with the employer
for reasons unrelated to his work-related injury.
6. The
employee testified that he has not looked for work since he was terminated in
December of 2006.
7. The
employee also testified that his work restrictions were the same on the date he
testified as they were prior to his termination.
8. Further,
the employee testified that he performs bookkeeping functions for his son's
business and that he is not compensated for that work.
9. Based on the foregoing, the Board, by a 5-0
vote, finds that the employee has failed to establish an inability to return to
gainful employment.
Wherefore, the employee's Petition for
Extension of Benefits is Denied.
SO ORDERED.