|
Date: |
|
|
Meeting
location: |
Cross Building |
|
Notes
compiled by: |
Anita Bernhardt |
|
Chair(s) /
Facilitator(s): |
Patrick
Phillips/Anita Bernhardt |
|
Members
present: |
Patrick Phillips,
Anita Bernhardt, Vince Shatto, |
|
Agenda
Item(s): |
Major
Points of Discussion: |
|
1.Overview of MLR Review |
|
|
2.Revisit of Dispositions/ Motivations |
The essence of this part of the document is student empowerment. A belief in liberty, equality. . .are essential to making a difference in society |
|
3.Cross- Cutting ideas |
This was dropped in favor of identifying “Big Ideas” that have surfaced in our conversationsand the resources that we have considered. (See attached document) |
|
4. The Hallmarks list. |
Three important areas are identified in the hallmarks: a. attitudes and beliefs, b. civic and political knowledge and cognitive skills c. political/community participation. |
|
5.Prioritize the ideas. |
Did not get to this. |
|
6. Consider MLR: What’s good? What’s missing? |
Did not get to this. |
|
7. Implications of the State Policy Resources |
Did not get to this. |
|
Next
Steps: |
|
|
Task 1 Each person should go on line to the State Policy Resource and look at the information available information. Decide
whether any of the information has implications for this work or whether we should add any ideas to the Big Ideas list related to information found
on this site. http://www.ecs.org/html/educationIssues/CitizenshipEducation/CitEdDB_intro.asp |
Everyone for the next meeting. |
|
Our final report
might be modeled after page 4 of Developing Citizenship Competencies from Kindergarten Through Grade 12 and should include a bulleted and prioritized list of ‘Big Ideas’ regarding civics education and a list of the resources considered
by this group. |
|
|
Next
Meeting Date/Time: |
|
|
Location: |
Cross
Building |
|
Items for
Next Meeting Agenda: |
What’s good? What’s missing? |