Skip Maine state header navigation
![]() |
| Home | Contact Us | Careers | Calendar |
|
Maine.gov
> PFR Home
> Insurance Regulation
> Cancellation Hearing Index
>
Cancellation / Nonrenewal : Docket No. INS-06-2160 Decision
Archives: 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008
Steven Sereyko v. MMG Insurance Company The insured requested a hearing following receipt of a notice of homeowners insurance policy cancellation citing the failure to comply with loss control recommendations as the reason for cancellation. At hearing, the company maintained that it issued loss control recommendations. The insured discussed his responses to those recommendations. Held: For the insured. Although the Maine
Property Insurance Cancellation Control Act, in 24-A M.R.S.A. §
3049(10), permits cancellation if the insured fails to comply with reasonable
loss control recommendations within 90 days after notice from the insurer,
this policy does not mirror the statute. Instead, the policy permits
cancellation for “your failure to comply with reasonable loss
control recommendations within 90 days after you receive from us our
intent to cancel the policy.” Under the wording of the policy,
the 90 day period in which the insured must comply with the recommendations
starts after the insured receives the company’s intent
to cancel the policy. An insurer is free to establish terms in its policy
that are more favorable to the insured than the statute. However, the
insurer is then bound by such terms and unable to rely upon the actual
statutory language in a cancellation action.
Last Updated: October 1, 2008 |
| Copyright © 2006 All rights reserved. |