Skip Maine state header navigation
![]() |
| Home | Contact Us | Careers | Calendar |
|
Maine.gov
> PFR Home
> Insurance Regulation
> Cancellation Hearing Index
> Cancellation / Nonrenewal Docket No. INS 04-15471 Decision
Archives: 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008
This proceeding arose upon a request for hearing made by Denise Estes to contest the pending cancellation of automobile insurance coverage provided to Denise and Shannon Estes (the “Insureds”) by North East Insurance Company (the “Company.”) On October 18, 2004, the Company mailed a notice of cancellation effective November 18, 2004, on policy number 02180091869 citing “a recent MVR for Denise indicated the following: 06/20/04 suspension” as the grounds for cancellation. Pursuant to 24-A M.R.S.A. § 2920, the Insureds’ hearing request was made within the statutory time period. A hearing in this matter was held on November 18, 2004, pursuant to 24-A M.R.S.A. § 2920 with Connie Mayette sitting as designated hearing officer. See 24-A M.R.S.A. § 210. The purpose of the hearing was limited to establishing the existence of proof or evidence given by the Company to support its reason for policy cancellation. Ethel Potvin, Personal Lines Manager, represented the Company at the hearing. Denise Estes represented the Insureds at the hearing. FINDINGS OF FACT
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION OF LAW Ms. Potvin testified that Denise Estes’s license suspension of June 20, 2004, occurred during the current policy term which runs from December 2003 to December 2004. She stated that the suspension was still in effect at the time the notice of cancellation was mailed. She submitted a motor vehicle record dated October 4, 2004, and the post office certificate of mailing. Ms. Estes agreed that her license had been suspended, but argued that the suspension had not been caused by any illegal act. She also stated that her license has been restored, and she provided a document from the Maine Bureau of Motor Vehicles dated November 15, 2004, which stated the suspension had been deleted. Ms. Potvin objected to the admission of this document, arguing that the subsequent deletion had no bearing on the fact that the license had been suspended. The objection was noted but overruled by the hearing officer. The Superintendent of Insurance has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 24-A M.R.S.A. § 2920. The Company bears the burden of proof for establishing that the statutory grounds for policy cancellation exist. Based on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Superintendent hereby concludes that the Company has established adequate grounds for policy cancellation. As indicated previously, 24-A M.R.S.A. § 2914(4) permits cancellation of an automobile insurance policy if a named insured experiences a driver’s license suspension during the policy period. Only the following 3 types of suspensions are listed in the statute as exceptions: (1) a first or second suspension under 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2471 (adult provisional license); (2) a suspension pursuant to 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2472 (juvenile provisional license); and (3) a suspension pursuant to 28-A M.R.S.A. § 2052 (illegal transportation of liquor by a minor.) In the present case, Ms. Estes’ license was suspended during the policy period due to an adverse medical condition. Such a suspension does not meet any of the exceptions provided in the statute. Accordingly, the Company has demonstrated that the requirements of 24-A M.R.S.A. § 2914(4) to cancel the policy at issue have been met. INDEX OF RECORD: Insured Exhibit 1 – Hearing Request ORDER AND NOTICE OF APPEAL RIGHTS This Decision and Order is a final agency action within the meaning of the Maine Administrative Procedure Act. It is appealable to the Superior Court in the manner provided in Title 24-A M.R.S.A. § 236 and M.R. Civ. P. 80C. Any party to the hearing may initiate an appeal within 30 days after receipt of this notice. Any aggrieved nonparty whose interests are substantially and directly affected may initiate an appeal within 40 days of the date of this Decision and Order. There is no automatic stay pending appeal; application for stay may be made in the manner provided in 5 M.R.S.A. § 11004.
Dated December 2, 2004 Alessandro A. Iuppa ____________________________________ Last Updated: July 16, 2008 |
| Copyright © 2006 All rights reserved. |