Skip Maine state header navigation

Agencies | Online Services | Help

Skip First Level Navigation | Skip All Navigation

Home > IT Governance Plan > Information Technology Management Plan

Information Technology Management Plan

Approved by the ISPB November 18, 2004 (IT Management Plan Worddoc)

A framework to govern the acquisition, management, and use of communication and information resources in Maine state government

Table of Contents

Letter from the CIO

Richard B. Thompson

The need to provide shared agency solutions at a statewide level is a key initiative for this administration. As the State's Chief Information Officer, I am dedicated to meeting this initiative, while aligning our IT resources organizationally to meet the business needs of the State.

This plan provides a framework for the effective management of information technology with its primary role redirected to support the business objectives of agencies and facilitate efforts to provide efficient and effective services to the citizens of the State.

Moving forward with the strategies and actions highlighted in this plan, which will be detailed in statewide and agency implementation plans, will allow for more extensive information sharing across agency levels and provide improved services to the public.

This IT plan also provides a foundation for an enterprise wide approach to the management of information technology. The State of Maine needs to implement an organizational transition from functional silos to a process oriented environment. Many future technology efforts will cross multiple agencies with a single goal of providing services to the citizens of Maine . This environment requires technology which can communicate, interoperate and share data and resources while reducing the costs through the use of enterprise architecture and standards for IT. Additionally, the State should realize operational cost savings as we view IT services from an Enterprise perspective and work toward consolidation and collaboration of services where appropriate.

 

Executive Overview

The Importance of an IT Management Plan

An IT management plan is a tool that provides decision makers with the information they require to best allocate their IT resources and fund their investment. The plan provides a snapshot of the current IT environment (this plan refers to the Statewide Technical Architecture Document for that snapshot, http://www.maine.gov/cio/strategic/index.htm ) and documents overarching objectives that lay the foundation for the development of the architecture and standards that will ensure the delivery of quality, cost effective IT solutions.

The plan includes short term goals and actionable strategies that support the mission of Maine 's major objectives and/or initiatives. There may be changes to these goals, or new goals added, and all changes must be tracked and performance measured to maintain the integrity and value of the IT Management Plan. Additionally, as goals are achieved the plan must be modified to reflect the outcomes. How we measure the value when goals are achieved is critical to those who utilize that plan as a tool to assist when making IT investments.

The plan also ensures that we will meet the priorities of the Governor's Office that relate to information technology. They are as follows:

  • One stop delivery of services
  • Intergovernmental collaboration
  • Aggregation of resources
  • Information technology that fosters economic development
  • Ability to share information/data across state/federal/municipal governments
  • Manage IT from the perspective of the entire enterprise

The summary of expected outcomes of the plan is:

  • New IT Governance Model to support Enterprise approach to IT
  • Collaboration/consolidation of IT services (e-mail, desktop support, etc) to reduce redundancy, improve service delivery, reduce IT costs, and improve equity
  • Standardization of network management protocols to improve connectivity and interoperability
  • Centralization of IT procurement to leverage buying across agencies
  • Development of adaptive architecture that will support quick response to new requirements and opportunities
  • Improvement in statewide IT security policies and procedures to ensure the integrity of all IT applications and data
  • Application development and management at the agency level with focus on data integration and collaboration

State of Maine Information Technology Guiding Principles

Maine State Government makes decisions based on these guiding principles.

  1.   Drive IT initiatives by business needs, goals and objectives and have a sound business case before new investments are made.
  2. Maintain flexibility, with accountability, to respond to new service needs.
  3. Foster intergovernmental cooperation.
  4. View information technology in Maine government from the perspective of the entire enterprise, rather than from the perspective of a few individual agencies or jurisdictions.
  5. Develop a process to share information easily within government organizations and with outside partners.
  6. Aggregate resources where feasible in order to reduce duplication, increase efficiency and effectiveness, and increase purchasing power.
  7. Employ technology that is flexible and interoperable so that changing business needs can be responded to quickly and efficiently.
  8. Recognize that many agencies have massive investments in existing technology and devise strategies that leverage those investments when practical.
  9. Assure the accuracy, integrity, privacy, confidentiality, and appropriate availability of information.
  10. Develop an IT workforce with the skills required to develop, manage, and fully utilize the State's technology investment. 

Key Issues Identified in Current Environment

Process for Addressing Identified Issues

After the identification of issues, the OCIO developed a communication and planning process that would allow for the crafting of a statewide IT management plan. The Chief Information Officer chartered an executive group with the Commissioner of the Department of Administrative and Financial Services as the Executive Sponsor to provide guidance on improving the delivery of IT service delivery from the business perspective. Additionally, an IT Management Project Team and focus groups were organized to solicit input from a broad range of stakeholders on how IT services and service delivery could be optimized, while maintaining and/or reducing costs.

Critical to the process was input from the Governor's Office on the top six priorities. They were as follows:

  • One stop delivery of services
  • Intergovernmental collaboration
  • Aggregation of resources
  • Information technology that fosters economic development
  • Ability to share information/data across state/federal/municipal governments
  • Manage IT from the perspective of the entire enterprise

In order to achieve operational excellence this IT Management Plan recognizes the weight of complexity on efficiency. Much of Maine 's IT operations are not visible to the customer but are necessary activities in order to deliver government services. The IT Management Plan focuses on differentiating between common versus specialized services and then apportioning responsibilities between the enterprise and the agencies in a way that balances each of their respective strengths.

Model for Delivery of IT Services

Model for Delivery IT Services

A key component of this plan is a change to the current model for delivery of IT services. The above diagram demonstrates the new model that we will utilize as more specific initiatives are established as an outcome of this plan. Currently many services that would fall under common and/or shared services in the new model are siloed within agencies. This model will ensure that we are utilizing our IT resources in the most efficient manner to provide quality, cost effective services.

Development, management and support of agency applications is best suited at the agency level. Through strong oversight and project management, agencies can align their process in an effective manner, at the level close to the recipient of the service or system benefit.

Shared services should be strongly encouraged and impediments to such activity analyzed and removed.

Governance

Key issues within IT governance were identified as follows:

  • IT governance structure is weak; CIO's responsibilities extend beyond scope of authority.
  • No defined processes for enterprise IT oversight.
  • Funding and procurement mechanisms do not work in concert to facilitate enterprise IT management.

An enterprise must be well governed to be well managed. An enterprise, by the breadth and complexity of its nature, requires a more innovative and flexible approach to governing than provided by more traditional models which were developed to oversee the functions of a departmental IT organization. The feedback received by the OCIO made it clear that in order to adequately anticipate and react to the increased pace of current technology challenges, a revision of IT governance is necessary.

The changes that will be sought to improve governance are as follows:

  • The Office of Information Technology will be formed by consolidating the Bureau of Information Services and The Office of the CIO.
  • The Information Services Policy Board (ISPB) dissolved.
  • An Executive Steering Committee established to provide guidance on the business requirements of agencies and government as a whole.
  • A CIO Council established in order to provide direct communication and guidance from departmental Agency Technology Officer's (ATO's) to the CIO.
  • A new governance model for approval of IT projects will be implemented, utilizing an agency's portfolio as a significant tool in the decision making process, as well as incorporating a statewide perspective in each decision.

This new governance structure will provide effective counsel to guide the enterprise forward, improve collaboration to begin to break down silos and provide the opportunity to better leverage IT investments across all levels of government; critical gains given the current fis cal environment and increased security concerns.

Office of Information Technology

One of the most immediate actions of the IT plan related to Governance is the proposed merger of the Office of the Chief Information Officer with the Bureau of Information Services (BIS), creating the Office of Information Technology (OIT). The Office of Information Technology will be engineered to take a statewide strategic view of technology and deliver customer focused technology services thru Service Level Agreements.

Office of Information Technology Structure

The tactical role of the organization will continue within Operations and Production Services Divisions, but two new and critical functional divisions have been incorporated into OIT.

New Divisions

The Performance Management Division

The first priority of the Performance Management Division will be to develop service excellence standards for the Office of Information Technology, and to cultivate strong partnerships with agencies. The PMD is directly integrated with the CIO with the authority to refocus priorities of both Strategic Management and Operations Divisions.

Strategic Management Division

The increasing frequency of change, the complexity of our technology, and the business dependence on IT has led to substantial increases in the typical size and risk of IT projects , inefficiencies accompanying distributed architecture, weakened security, absence of web management, and lack of identification of current and needed assets . A rigorous planning process is the first step to mitigate the risk of IT project failures, assure assets are managed effectively, as well as to ensure that the infrastructure continues to service the enterprise effectively.

Strategy

Key issues related to the IT strategies within Maine State Government:

  • State of Maine lacks a common enterprise vision for the business of government.
  • Cohesive enterprise IT strategy for achieving business objectives does not exist.
  • New and emerging technologies are being explored in an ad hoc manner.
  • 24/7 government placing new pressures on old business processes.
  • Priorities, resource allocation, and trade-offs are being made in isolation.
  • Long-term planning incomplete for supporting rollout of enterprise initiatives.
  • Enterprise IT investment not being managed as a portfolio.

The new governance model created during this process addresses many high level strategy issues by focusing on IT from an enterprise level. It is not always the cost of individual systems driving the need for an enterprise approach, but rather the cost of service delivery. Citizens demand quality service, accessibility, and value from government programs at all levels. The State's ability to recapture “enterprise-level thinking” regarding a common, shared infrastructure will be a critical success factor in accomplishing the goal of building the next generation's communications networks and data centers and meeting the needs of the State's constituents.

Strategies that will address the identified issues are:

  • Implementation of the Portfolio Management Policy to improve planning within agencies
  • Enterprise oversight and review of department/agency portfolios to identify opportunities for collaboration and prioritize funding
  • Consolidation and collaboration of IT services where appropriate in order to allow agencies to focus on their core missions
  • Improved communication with consumers of IT services to ensure the services and delivery methods are continually meeting or exceeding their expectations
  • Development of a method to measure value added for all new IT initiatives
  • Actively foster shared applications development, use and maintenance

Infrastructure

Key issues related to the IT Infrastructure were identified as follows:

  • Infrastructure (networks/data centers) is fragmented and duplicative
  • Insufficient resource allocation to disaster recovery, security and business continuity planning
  • Management practices and operational procedures are inconsistent
  • No agreement on BIS' role in managing the enterprise network infrastructure
  • Infrastructure growth is not guided by a comprehensive enterprise plan that is tied to a business strategy
  • Use of service level agreements and performance metrics is not institutionalized
  • Ongoing maintenance and replacement requirements are not well funded; compete with new initiatives for funding

The growing pains experienced by agencies as they transition from local to shared infrastructure needs to be eased. This IT Management Plan will facilitate decision making and dispute resolution surrounding such issues as defining the shared infrastructure, and determining when it should be deployed, how it should be paid for, and when its use is mandatory.

  • Undertake consolidation and modernization of the IT infrastructure under the Office of Information Technology (OIT), in line with the strategic objectives and supported by an analysis of total cost vs. expected benefits.
  • Review and update all infrastructure standards and policies
  • Develop best in class performance measurements and deploy them throughout all IT organizations for consistency in reporting
  • Build new funding model that will address required infrastructure maintenance upgrades and development
  • Review enterprise level opportunities such as email, procurement and desktops

The plan also documents goals, actionable strategies and areas of opportunities identified during the planning process that we will expand to establish a long range technology strategic goals for the next three to five years by the end of this calendar year.

Identified Goals and Actionable Strategies

The following Goals and identified strategies represent the collective thinking of a cross section of IP professionals in state government. The first tasks of the CIO, Executive team, and the CIO Council are to prioritize and focus on the actions that will achieve the administration's expectations and improve the operation and use of IT across the spectrum of users and resulting services.

1. Goal: Simplify delivery of all government services and information to customers

  1. Actionable Strategy : Share common data elements within state government internally (learn data sharing needs from the business/program side of government).
  2. Actionable Strategy : Coordinate the Business driven expansion of E-Government services.
  3. Actionable Strategy: Develop teams to analyze data and business process overlap and identify opportunities for improvements in business service delivery.
  4. Actionable Strategy: Perform focus groups/stakeholder analysis and determine what services customers need and want and then inform them of the cost of developing that level of technology, infrastructure and service delivery systems.
  5. Actionable Strategy : Develop public access mechanisms for citizens and businesses partners that contain the appropriate security and privacy at each level of public access.
  6. Actionable Strategies : Encourage joint business strategies.
  7. Actionable Strategy: Develop an educational and awareness campaign that will create a realistic understanding among the public and the Legislature as to what “One Stop” services are (and what they are not) and what they will cost.

2. Goal: Manage information technology from an enterprise (statewide) perspective, based on business needs.

  1. Actionable Strategy : Approve and implement new governance model to manage IT from an Enterprise perspective.
  2. Actionable Strategy : Foster sharing of information by analyzing and learning from successes and failures. Institutionalize sharing/evaluation of new technology that could benefit the whole enterprise. Such sharing will occur at both the business and technology levels.
  3. Actionable Strategy: Consolidate enterprise services where available.
  4. Actionable Strategy : Establish criteria for enterprise services.
  5. Actionable Strategy: Encourage development of statewide business plan at the Executive Level.
  6. Actionable Strategy: Complete the conversion to enterprise services (example: DHCP, EPO, etc.).
  7. Actionable Strategy: Determine what form of enforcement options are effective and available when it comes to enterprise standards compliance.
  8. Actionable Strategy: Fully implement enterprise email.
  9. Actionable Strategy: Study and evaluate the possibility that ATOs should co-report directly to the Commissioner of their respective agencies and the state Chief Information Officer.

3. Goal: Develop collaborative relationships among state agencies, public and higher education, local governments, federal government, private sector, and non-profits in order to improve service delivery.

  1. Actionable Strategy: Work with Executive Steering Committee to set business driven priorities that will guide the development of all collaborative efforts.
  2. Actionable Strategy: Identify those collaborations that are already happening - evaluating successes, failures and identifying opportunities.
  3. Actionable Strategy: Develop relationships between agencies that will eliminate any barriers to collaboration.
  4. Actionable Strategy: Establish resource-sharing model (dollars/HR/etc.) to create a better mechanism for sharing costs.
  5. Actionable Strategy: Establish processes, standards and protocols for sharing data/resources.
  6. Actionable Strategy : Identify incentives to encourage relationships with outside partners.
  7. Actionable Strategy: Explore ways to employ statewide IT solutions to foster economic development in Maine (Radio Network; Cell Network, etc.).
  8. Actionable Strategy: Conduct a “Super Case Worker” case study to identify and test opportunities for effective collaboration and sharing of data, information and systems and to improve services to State clients.

4. Goal: Contain or reduce IT spending in State Government – providing the most effective and efficient service, while securing the best value for every IT dollar spent.

  1. Actionable Strategy: Leverage volume purchasing to reduce cost.
  2. Actionable Strategy: Evaluate current software licensing practices and investigate alternatives (best practices).
  3. Actionable Strategy: Study current data/applications delivery system (e.g., evaluate the number of servers in use).
  4. Actionable Strategy: Have agencies evaluate where their resources are being used so that we truly understand our ongoing IT “running rate.”
  5. Actionable Strategy: Develop and enforce a clear set of policies and procedures designed to control and more effectively manage external IT costs (vendors, consultants, contract management, etc.).
  6. Actionable Strategy: Define the long term architecture for delivery of services, including an exploration of open source products.
  7. Actionable Strategy: Study potential IT solutions that may encourage effective redeployment of services to achieve a more effective and geographically balanced delivery of services to all customers throughout the state.
  8. Actionable Strategy: Encourage joint business strategies to overcome regional/distance issues.
  9. Actionable Strategy: Re-examine the State Government networking strategy (i.e., voice, data, video) within the context of possible technology changes that may occur over the next 5 years and beyond.
  10. Actionable Strategy: Perform a study and develop a plan and formula to re-route enterprise funding.
  11. Actionable Strategy (long term): Study the appropriate “pairing” of responsibility and accountability functions throughout the State IT management system.

Areas of Opportunity

Messaging (e-mail).

The State messaging architecture contains no common mail directory and utilizes hosting servers in a dozen agencies. Standardization of the mail services is a next step and a central post office will be implemented this biennium to facilitate reduced support requirements for the state.

Network Services.

Intra-office connectivity and support must be accomplished even at the smallest agencies. A pool of network administrators from the Bureau of Information Services will provide network support to all agencies. This will increase standardization and interoperability while freeing agency resources for tasks specific to that agency.

Procurement.

IT Procurement is inefficient when done on an agency basis, “mass” buys are not leveraged and unnecessary duplication of effort occurs. The goal is to streamline and centralize IT Procurement as appropriate.

Desktop Support.

Desktop support is not uniform or equitable across the State. Support varies and agencies utilize different contracts or software to provide those services. Consolidated support, with adequate training for all users, and use of the same office automation, hardware and software will be evaluated.

Hardware Maintenance.

Hardware maintenance , purchases, and support are inconsistent and not leveraged across the state. Efforts are underway to consolidate maintenance contracts, make aggregated purchases, and provide support for all agencies, no matter how small.

Adaptive Architecture.

An Enterprise IT Architecture is critical to the state if we are to meet the challenge of e-Government successfully. The ability to use common solutions identified in the e-Government architecture, e.g., e-payment, is enhanced through an Adaptive Enterprise IT Architecture . This architecture is critical for the state to also realize effective disaster recovery and business continuity for IT resources. Review of the State's Enterprise Architecture is currently under way with a reengineering of DNS and DHCP. Anticipated reengineering in Active Directory Services will happen this biennium.

Security.

As the State moves into the e-Government arena, added pressure is applied to IT security and protection of information, twenty four hours a day seven days a week. IT security is not only provided by the technical capabilities of the software and networks the State implements, but also the policies, procedures, management controls, and audits must be in place. The State will continue to be diligent in IT security and the CIO will publish statewide guidance in this area to protect the information the State holds electronically after agencies submit their IT Security Plan at the end of this calendar year.

Next Steps

This plan is intended to steer IT management in the State of Maine in a direction that results in business goals and cost savings that agencies can rapidly integrate. Upon approval of this plan a process will follow that charters the CIO Council to formulate an Implementation Plan to move forward with specific initiatives. By adopting a plan that reflects and supports enterprise business strategies, and supports agency management of applications, the State will be better positioned to immediately determine where short range savings can be discovered.

Summary by Richard B. Thompson, CIO

This management plan is not intended to limit or stifle department or agency creativity but instead to provide a stable infrastructure and environment in which to solve common business problems faced by many agencies and to allow agencies to collaborate on significant efforts. The plan is built on the foundation of a management model which utilizes the best features of both centralized and decentralized IT management, support and decision making.

I recognize that some cultural changes are essential in order for us to be successful moving forward with this IT plan, but the benefits to the stakeholders (state government agencies, taxpayers and state IT employees) will be significant.

State government agencies and employees will benefit as the technology they require to meet their business objectives is delivered to their desktops in a consistent and cost effective manner. Small and medium sized agencies that typically lack resources and depth of expertise will have access to skill sets and technologies not currently available to them, thus closing the gap between the technology “haves” and “have-nots.”

Taxpayers and customers benefit from improvements in the deployment of seamless, integrated systems and services, particularly Web-enabled solutions promoting convenience and ease of use. In so doing, Maine is fulfilling the vision of a digital government, available twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year. Taxpayers will reap the benefits of the cost-savings over the long-term and these savings can be used to fund initiatives to improve citizens' lives in the areas of education, social services, health, public safety, and transportation.

In closing I would like to thank everyone for their efforts in providing input on how Maine can move forward with initiatives that will allow us to deliver cost effective services to our citizens, businesses and government partners.