Skip Maine state header navigation
This report describes Commission actions taken during 2002 to promote natural gas efficiency through ratemaking mechanisms, contracts, and unbundling of transportation and commodity services.
Gas Utility Company Activity
A. Maine Natural Gas, L.L.C. (formerly CMP Natural Gas, L.L.C.)
Since 1999, using its authority to enter into contracts that rely on entrepreneurial resources rather than regulatory oversight, Maine Natural Gas has contracted with increasing numbers of large customers that serve to “anchor” expansion into new areas. These customers include the Westbrook Energy Center (WEC) gas-fired electric generation facility, Brunswick Naval Air Station (BNAS), and the University of Southern Maine at its Gorham campus. Maine Natural Gas first built facilities to WEC, then to the Gorham campus. In the fall of 2001, the company completed installation of its pipeline system to BNAS to begin service on November 1, 2001. The Company continues to work toward expanding service in Windham, Gorham, Brunswick, Topsham, and other municipalities within the state such as the Augusta-Waterville area.
There were no rate structure or regulatory changes made to Maine Natural Gas’s operations in 2002. When initially certified, under its rate plan, Maine Natural agreed not to seek a base rate increase for five years to counterbalance the degree of entrepreneurial freedom that it was granted by the Commission. Unlike Maine's two other LDCs, Maine Natural Gas does not have a cost-of-gas adjustment under which it may collect its gas commodity costs from ratepayers. Instead, it employs a commodity pricing strategy using market price inputs and offering customers either fixed time or flexible pricing options. Maine Natural Gas is continuing to aggressively expand service into new areas of the state.
In November 2000, Northern’s ultimate parent corporation, NiSource, Inc., closed its merger with Columbia Energy Group. The integration of these two large corporate families has resulted in management and policy changes and staff cuts at the Northern/Bay State Gas level. The Commission continues to monitor Northern’s post-merger operations and revenues to ensure that service to Maine’s customers remains safe, adequate, and reasonably priced. The Commission monitored Northern’s New Hampshire Division rate case to gather information to assist it in determining whether Maine should initiate a rate case for Northern in 2003. A determination of this question is expected shortly.
In response to ongoing customer complaints regarding call center and billing operations, the Commission conducted investigations of particular operations during 2002 and initiated a management audit of Northern's customer services to determine their adequacy. The Commission will use the information gained by the management audit in considering whether it should implement alternative regulatory plans, such as benchmark and performance-based mechanisms, to help ensure that Northern meets adequate service standards despite substantial post-merger operational restructuring that includes the transfer of a substantial number of service operations and management to the mid-western offices of the parent corporation.
In 2001, Bangor Gas completed installation of its main pipeline to the Bangor-Brewer area and, with the pipeline and facilities it had already installed in those municipalities, was in a position to expand service significantly. It is steadily adding to its customer base in all categories of service. Bangor Gas also serves the Bucksport Energy gas-fired electric generation facility, Georgia Pacific (formerly Fort James Corporation), and the University of Maine at its Orono campus.
In 2002, the Commission approved a streamlined mid-period cost-of-gas adjustment procedure proposed by Bangor Gas to more efficiently match rates with gas costs. Bangor proposed these changes to reduce the potential for large accruals of over- or under-collection of gas revenues, as well as to reduce regulatory expense for making these adjustments.
Natural Gas Restructuring
The Commission has moved slowly toward gas restructuring in Maine, monitoring developments in neighboring New England states and taking actions that suit Maine’s market and regulatory environment. While the Commission’s regulatory actions to restructure gas service have been moderate compared to actions taken in New Hampshire and Massachusetts, an informal survey of selected registered Maine gas marketers revealed no pressing matters related to gas competition in Maine that warrant immediate regulatory attention.