Skip Maine state header navigation
Remove from Confidential Treatment – July,
22 2003
STATE OF MAINE
PUBLIC UTILITIES
COMMISSION Docket No. 2003-381
July
8, 2003
MAINE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
Standard Offer Bidding Process
ORDER DESIGNATING
STANDARD OFFER PROVIDERS
WELCH, Chairman; DIAMOND and REISHUS, Commissioners
________________________________________________________________
Through this
Order, we designate FPL Energy Power Marketing, Inc. (FPL) as the standard
offer provider for the medium non-residential classes in the Central Maine
Power Company (CMP) and Bangor Hydro-Electric Company (BHE) service territories
for a six-month period beginning September 1, 2003. The average price for standard offer service for this period will
be 5.57 cents per kWh in CMP’s territory and 5.62 cents per kWh for BHE’s
territory. At this time, we also
designate Select Energy, Inc. (Select) as the standard offer provider for the
large non-residential classes in the CMP and BHE service territories for a
six-month period beginning September 1, 2003.
The average price for standard offer service for this period will be
5.74 cents per kWh in CMP’s territory and 5.43 cents per kWh in BHE’s
territory.
Maine’s Restructuring Act
directs the Commission to administer periodic bid processes to select providers
of standard offer service. 35-A
M.R.S.A. § 3212(2). The arrangement
with the current standard offer providers for service to customers in the
medium and large standard offer classes in the CMP and BHE service territories
terminates on August 31, 2003.[1] Accordingly, on June 3, 2003, the Commission
initiated the process to solicit bids for the provision of standard offer
service to these classes for the period beginning September 1, 2003. Order Regarding Standard Offer Service
for the Large and Medium Classes of Central Maine Power Company and Bangor
Hydro-Electric Company, Docket No. 2003-381 (Jun 3, 2002). In our Order initiating the solicitation
process, we decided to seek bids for two alternative terms, one for six months
and one for a year. Id. at 2. We
explained that in our last solicitation, we accepted bids for the CMP and BHE
medium and large classes for a six-month period to minimize the time for which
standard offer prices may deviate from prevailing market prices and noted that
we confirmed this basic approach in our recent standard offer inquiry. Report on Standard Offer Service Issues, Docket
No. 2003-127 at 4-7 (May 28, 2003).
However, we decided to also ask for one-year terms to protect against
the possibility that six-month bids may be inadequate.
Pursuant to Commission-approved
Request for Proposals (RFP), indicative bids were received June 17, 2003.[2] Since that time, our Staff has been
discussing various non-price terms with bidders. Upon the conclusion of discussions on non-price terms with a
sufficient number of bidders, we asked for final, binding bids to be presented
on July 8, 2003.
At the outset, we note that, as in
our more recent standard offer solicitations, the current process was very
competitive and thus standard offer prices will continue to be established by a
competitive electricity market as contemplated by the Restructuring Act. Upon review of all the bids received today,
and applying the selection criteria specified in section 8(C) of Chapter 301,
we designate FPL as the standard offer provider for the CMP and BHE medium
non-residential classes and Select as the standard offer provider for the CMP
and BHE large non-residential classes, both for the six-month terms beginning
September 1, 2003. The FPL and Select
bids were the lowest bids in the respective classes. The average prices are as follows:
|
|
CMP |
BHE |
|
Medium Class |
5.57 cents/kWh |
5.62 cents/kWh |
|
Large Class |
5.74 cents/kWh |
5.43 cents/kWh |
The
actual prices for both the medium and large classes vary by month, while the
large classes prices also vary by time-of-day and contain demand as well energy
charges. The actual prices, which
represent a modest decrease from the last six-month average prices, are
contained in an appendix to this Order.
Our review of the FPL and Select bids indicate that
they comply with all requirements of Chapter 301 and the RFP (including the
security requirements). Additionally,
both FPL and Select included bidder conditions with their bids. By designating FPL and Select as standard
offer providers, we hereby accept their bidder conditions and incorporate them
into this Order. As required by
Select’s bidder conditions, we affirm and state that our advice given in the
Advisory Opinion Regarding Rights and Obligations of Standard Offer Providers
issued by the Commission on November 28, 2000 In Docket No. 2000-808 applies to
the current solicitation. The bidder
conditions, as well as the statements of commitment, are attached as appendices
to this Order.
Section 8(C)(2) of Chapter 301
establishes the lowest price as the primary selection criteria in considering
standard offer bids. However, section
8(C)(4) requires the Commission to select three standard offer providers within
a utility service territory if this can be accomplished without increasing
standard offer prices within any standard offer class by more than 1.5%. The acceptance of the lowest bids in this
solicitation results in three different suppliers for both the CMP and BHE
service territories. Thus, there is no
need for us to consider other bids to satisfy the “three provider” requirement.
As in our last solicitation, we have
chosen six-month terms for both the medium and large classes to minimize the
amount of time standard offer prices for either class may deviate from
prevailing market prices. This action
is consistent with the recommendations that we made in our December 2002
standard offer report to the Legislature.
In that report, we concluded that standard offer service for the medium
and large classes should not be just another supply service and that it should
be designed to encourage migration to the competitive market. We stated that, in designing standard offer
service to be more of a last resort default service, prices should more closely
follow market changes; one approach to accomplish this would be for standard
offer to have shorter terms. Our
decision to accept six-month bids will have desired impact of ensuring that
standard offer prices do not deviate from market prices for any substantial
period of time.
Finally, we recognize that the bidder conditions approved in this Order
create certain risks for CMP and BHE that should be properly borne by
customers. Therefore, we explicitly
find that any direct
or indirect costs, obligations, expenses or damages reasonably incurred by CMP
or BHE, including administrative and security costs, in fulfilling its
contractual obligations or exercising it contractual rights under the Standard
Offer Provider Service Agreements it will enter with FPL and Select shall be
fully recovered, with carrying costs, from customers either through
transmission and distribution rates or standard offer rates.
This Order will be treated as designated confidential
information pursuant Protective Order issued in this proceeding for a two-week
period. After that, the confidential
treatment of this Order will be removed.
Dated at
Augusta, Maine, this 8th day of July, 2003.
BY
ORDER OF THE COMMISSION
_______________________________
Dennis
L. Keschl
Administrative
Director
COMMISSIONERS
VOTING FOR: Welch
Reishus
Diamond
[1]
By
Order issued September 18, 2001, the Commission designated a standard offer
provider for residential and small commercial customers in the CMP and BHE
service territories for a 3-year period beginning March 1, 2002. Order Designating Standard offer Provider
and Directing Utilities to Enter Entitlements Agreements, Docket No.
2001-399 (Sept. 18, 2001). For this
reason, the Commission did not solicit bids for the small classes.
[2]
At
the same time, pursuant to our direction, CMP and BHE received
wholesale bids for the provision of standard offer supply. Because of the statutory preference for
retail bids and the Commission’s receipt of adequate retail indicative bids, we
directed the utilities to forego further processing of wholesale bids while the
Commission processed the retailed bids.