Skip Maine state header navigation
Findings of
Fact and Decision
Site Plan
Review Public Hearing
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
application for proposed co-location of antennas and equipment
at
SITE PLAN APPROVAL GRANTED:
Applicant
AT&T Wireless Services (“AWS”) appeared before the Town of
After
notice and public hearing, the Planning Board hereby finds that Applicant’s proposal
and application complies with the applicable requirements of the Wireless
Telecommunications Facilities Siting Ordinance of the Town of
SECTION 3 PURPOSE
SECTION 4
APPLICABILITY
Applicant’s
proposal does not qualify as an exemption to the Wireless Telecommunications
Facilities Siting Ordinance of the Town of
SECTION 5 REVIEW AND APPROVAL AUTHORITY
5.1 Approval Required
No person shall construct
or expand a wireless telecommunications facility without approval of the
Planning Board (PB) as follows:
A. Expansion of an Existing Facility and Co‑location. Approval by the PB is required for any expansion of an existing wireless telecommunications facility; accessory use of an existing wireless telecommunications facility; or co‑location on an existing wireless telecommunications facility.
Applicant
has complied with this provision.
SECTION 6 APPROVAL PROCESS
6.1 Pre‑application Conference
Applicant’s request for a waiver of this provision is GRANTED.
6.2 Application
All persons seeking approval of the PB under this Ordinance shall submit an application as provided below. The CEO shall be responsible for ensuring that notice of the application has been published in a newspaper of general circulation in the community.
Application for Planning Board Approval. An application for approval by the PB must be submitted to the CEO. The application must include the following information:
1. Documentation of the applicant's right, title, or interest in the property on which the facility is to be sited, including the name and address of the property owner and applicant.
Applicant has complied with this
provision.
2. A copy of the FCC license for the facility, or a signed statement from the owner or operator of the facility attesting that the facility complies with current FCC regulations.
Applicant
has complied with this provision.
3. A USGS 7.5 minute topographic map showing the location of all structures and wireless telecommunications facilities above one hundred fifty (150) feet in height above ground level, except antennas located on roof tops, within a five (5) mile radius of the proposed facility, unless this information has been previously made available to the Town of Wales. This requirement may be met by submitting current information (within thirty (30) days of the date the application is filed) from the FCC Tower Registration Database.
Applicant’s request for a waiver of this provision is GRANTED.
4. A Site Plan:
a. prepared and certified by a professional engineer registered in the State of Maine indicating the location, type, and height of the proposed facility, antenna capacity, on‑site and abutting off‑site land uses, means of access, setbacks from property lines, and all applicable American National Standards Institute (ANSI) technical and structural codes;
Applicant has complied with
this provision.
b. certification by the applicant's Radio Frequency Engineer that the proposed facility complies with all FCC standards for radio emissions is required; and
Applicant has complied with
this provision.
c. a
boundary survey for the project performed by a land surveyor licensed by the
State of
Applicant’s request for a waiver of this provision is GRANTED.
5. A scenic assessment, consisting of the following:
Applicant
has complied with this provision.
Applicant’s request for a waiver of this provision is GRANTED.
Applicant
has complied with this provision.
d. A narrative discussing:
1. the applicant's analysis of the tower's impact on scenic values,
2. the tree line elevation of vegetation within one hundred (100) feet of the facility, and
3. proposed methods to minimize adverse visual impacts on scenic values.
Applicant
has complied with this provision.
6. A written description of how the proposed facility fits into the applicant's telecommunications network. This submission requirement does not require disclosure of confidential business information.
Applicant
has complied with applicable portions of this provision.
Applicant’s request for a waiver of the applicable portion of this
provision is GRANTED.
8. Identification of districts, sites, buildings, structures or objects, significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or culture, that are listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places (see 16 U. S. C. 470w(5); 36 CFR 60 and 800.
Applicant’s request for a waiver of this provision is GRANTED..
9. A signed statement stating that the owner of the wireless telecommunications facility and his or her successors and assigns agree to:
a. respond in a timely, comprehensive manner to a request for information from a potential co‑location applicant, in exchange for a reasonable fee not in excess of the actual cost of preparing a response;
b. negotiate in good faith for shared use of the wireless telecommunications facility by third parties;
c. allow shared use of the wireless telecommunications facility if an applicant agrees in writing to pay reasonable charges for co‑location;
d. require no more than a reasonable charge for shared use, based on community rates and generally accepted accounting principles. This charge may include but is not limited to a pro rata share of the cost of site selection, planning project administration, land costs, site design, construction, financing, return on equity, depreciation, and all of the costs of adapting the tower or equipment to accommodate a shared user without causing electromagnetic interference. The amortization of the above costs by the facility owner shall be accomplished at a reasonable rate, over the useful life span of the facility.
Applicant’s request for a waiver of this provision is GRANTED.
10. A form of surety approved by the PB to pay for the costs of removing the facility if it is abandoned.
This Board’s decision is CONDITIONED
upon the Applicant providing a bond or surety in a form that is satisfactory to
the Planning Board.
11. Evidence that a notice of the application has been published in a local newspaper of general circulation in the community.
Applicant has complied with
this provision.
7.1 Planning Board Approval Standards
Applicant has complied with this provision.
B. Design for Co‑location. A new wireless telecommunications facility and related equipment must be designed and constructed to accommodate expansion for future co‑location of at least three (3) additional wireless telecommunications facilities or providers. However, the PB may waive or modify this standard where the height limitation effectively prevents future co‑location.
C. Height. A new wireless
telecommunications facility must be no higher than the existing towers on Oak
Hill in the Town of
D. Setbacks. A new or expanded
wireless telecommunications facility must comply with the applicable setback
requirements of the Town of
1. The setback may be reduced by the PB upon a showing that the facility is designed to collapse in a manner that will not harm other property.
2. An antenna is exempt from the setback requirement if it extends no more than five (5) feet horizontally from the edge of the structure to which it is attached, and it does not encroach upon an abutting property.
Applicant’s request for a waiver of this provision is GRANTED.
E. Landscaping. A new wireless telecommunications facility and related equipment must be screened with plants from view by abutting properties, to the maximum extent practicable. Existing plants and natural land forms on the site shall also be preserved to the maximum extent practicable.
F. Fencing. A new wireless telecommunications facility must be fenced to discourage trespass on the facility and to discourage climbing on any structure by trespassers.
G. Lighting. A new wireless telecommunications facility shall be illuminated at the top of the facility by an FAA approved lighting apparatus. Security lighting may be used as long as it is shielded to be down‑directional to retain lighting within the boundaries of the site, to the maximum extent practicable.
H. Color and Materials. A new wireless telecommunications facility must be constructed with materials and colors that match or blend with the surrounding natural or built environment, to the maximum extent practicable. Unless otherwise required, muted colors, earth tones, and subdued hues shall be used.
I. Structural Standards. A new
wireless telecommunications facility must comply with current Electronic
Industries Association/Telecommunications Industries Association (EIA/TIA) 222
Revision Standard entitled "Structural Standards for
J. Visual Impact. The proposed wireless telecommunications facility will have no unreasonable adverse impact on scenic values.
K. Historic and Archaeological Properties. The proposed facility, to the greatest degree practicable, will have no unreasonable adverse impact upon a historic district, site or structure which is currently listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
SECTION 9: ABANDONMENT
Applicant shall provide a bond or surety for
the removal of said wireless facility, in a form that is satisfactory to the
Planning Board.
Signed:
TOWN OF