REPORT
OF THE MAINE STATE REVENUE FORECASTING COMMITTEE
This
report summarizes the Maine State Revenue Forecasting Committee’s review and
revisions of the estimates of General Fund, Highway Fund, and Fund for a Healthy
Maine (Tobacco Settlement Fund) revenues for the fiscal years ending June 30,
2005 (FY05) through June 30, 2009 (FY09). This
forecast establishes the base revenues that must be used by the Governor in
submitting the 2006-2007 biennial budgets for the General Fund and the Highway
Fund. This forecast represents an
increase for the General Fund and the Highway Fund over the March 2004 forecast
as adjusted by legislative changes. The
primary driver of the increase of revenue in this forecast is the improvement of
the economic projections for the current calendar year, which more than offset
slightly lower projections of growth through the remainder of the forecast
period.
SUMMARY
TABLE OF DECEMBER 2004 FORECAST
|
General Fund ($'s in millions) |
|||||
|
|
FY05 |
FY06 |
FY07 |
FY08 |
FY09 |
|
Previous
Budgeted Amount |
$2,651.6
|
$2,669.9
|
$2,783.7
|
|
|
|
Net
Change from Current Forecast |
$72.0
|
$49.2
|
$45.0
|
|
|
|
Revised
Amount |
$2,723.6
|
$2,719.1
|
$2,828.6
|
$2,918.0
|
$3,022.8
|
|
Annual
% Growth |
1.5% |
-0.2% |
4.0% |
3.2% |
3.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highway Fund ($'s in millions) |
|||||
|
|
FY05 |
FY06 |
FY07 |
FY08 |
FY09 |
|
Previous
Budgeted Amount |
$317.4
|
$320.4
|
$329.3
|
|
|
|
Net
Change from Current Forecast |
$3.9
|
$10.0
|
$10.9
|
|
|
|
Revised
Amount |
$321.4
|
$330.4
|
$340.2
|
$348.8
|
$358.1
|
|
Annual
% Growth |
3.0% |
2.8% |
3.0% |
2.5% |
2.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund for a Healthy Maine ($'s in millions) |
|||||
|
|
FY05 |
FY06 |
FY07 |
FY08 |
FY09 |
|
Previous
Budgeted Amount |
$50.4
|
$52.8
|
$58.6
|
|
|
|
Net
Change from Current Forecast |
($1.8) |
($4.0) |
$0.8
|
|
|
|
Revised
Amount |
$48.5
|
$48.8
|
$59.4
|
$72.0
|
$73.1
|
|
Annual
% Growth |
-0.7% |
0.5% |
21.8% |
21.2% |
1.6% |
Note:
FY05 equals the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005; FY06 equals fiscal year ending
June 30, 2006; etc.
Amounts may not add due to rounding.
General
Fund: The change in the General Fund forecast presented here is
driven primarily by the updated economic forecast of the Consensus Economic
Forecasting Commission (see Appendix C). The
Commission’s November projections are more optimistic about employment growth
than its previous forecast. Its
forecast of personal income growth is more optimistic as well compared to the
previous forecast. That increase is primarily driven by a substantial increase
in the calendar year 2004 projection (the growth rate increased from 4.0% to
5.5%), but the longer term projections for growth are less optimistic compared
to the previous forecast (calendar years 2005, 2006 and 2007 growth rates were
revised downward from 4.5% growth to 4.0%).
The 2004 calendar year increase more than offsets the longer-term slower
growth and was the primary driver of the increase in the revenue forecast. The Commission also revised its inflation estimate for the
2004 calendar year – increasing it from 2.0% to 2.8%. The longer-term projections for inflation were lowered,
resulting in a 2% inflation assumption for calendar year 2005 through calendar
year 2009.
The modest growth in the General Fund revenue pattern between FY04 and
FY05 and the negative growth between FY05 and FY06 reflect the impact of the 121st
Legislature’s changes to the revenue pattern, which included a number of
substantial “one-time” revenue increases.
These include the upfront payment for the lease of the wholesale liquor
operation, some delays in tax changes to conform to federal tax changes, Highway
Fund contributions to revenue sharing, increases in the General Fund share of
the Real Estate Transfer Tax and the Tax Amnesty program.
Highway
Fund: Highway Fund revenue is
projected upward for all major lines based on strong historic performances.
The major increases in the Highway Fund revenue forecast are in the Fuel
Taxes line and the Motor Vehicle Registrations and Fees line.
The increase in the Fuel Taxes line is driven by the increase in the
Personal Income economic variable. Like
the General Fund major tax lines, the short-term increase in that variable more
than offset the longer-term slower growth assumptions.
The increase in the assumed inflation rate in calendar year 2004 in the
economic forecast (2.8% instead of 2.0%) resulted in a higher assumed tax rate
as a result of the automatic indexing of the fuel taxes that began in FY04.
Motor vehicle registration and fees increased based on strong historic
performances.
Fund
for a Healthy Maine:
The Fund for a Healthy Maine is revised downward as a
result of new estimates of the tobacco settlement payments, which indicate that
the adjustments that are part of the settlement (particularly the volume
adjustment that is based on national cigarette sales) will reduce the payments
below previous estimates. In
addition, further downward revisions for the short-term (FY05 and FY06) result
from a revised start date assumption for the “Racino” (video slot machines
facility) at the Bangor Raceway. An
unexpected payment received in August 2004 from a new participating manufacturer
lessened the downward reduction in FY05. The
additional increase in the revenue flow to this fund stems from a new series of
payments (Strategic Contribution Payments) that begin in FY08 that have been
part of the Master Settlement Agreement from the beginning.
(Note: the estimates in this final report include additional adjustments
to the estimates of tobacco settlement payments that did not get included into
the December 1st memo.)
I.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND TO REVENUE FORECAST
This
report represents the major update of the revenue forecast and provides the
estimates of the revenue available for the Governor’s biennial budget
submissions due by January 7, 2005. This report and appendices provide a description of all of
the key elements to the revenue forecast for the General Fund, Highway Fund and
the Fund for a Healthy Maine. In
addition, this year’s report includes a projection of the estimated revenue
throughout the forecast period of certain taxes
on service providers dedicated to the Medicaid/MaineCare program that, while
dedicated, represent a substantial shift of resources from the General Fund.
A. Economic Forecast
As directed by the originating
Executive Order and the subsequent statute, the Committee closely examined the
economic assumptions developed by the Consensus Economic Forecasting Commission
(CEFC). (See Appendices A and C for background and report).
First, projected employment, income, interest rates and inflation changes
were used directly in the tax revenue estimating models maintained and operated
by Maine Revenue Services. Second,
Committee members assessed revenue trends predicted by models and by other
agencies against economic expectations offered by the CEFC.
The CEFC met October 7, 2004 to
prepare the economic assumptions that would become the basis of the Revenue
Forecasting Committee’s revenue projections.
Given that Maine’s economic health is highly dependent on national
economic activity, the Commission examined national economic trends and
projections. It concluded that
growth in the current calendar year based on data through 3 quarters would be
significantly higher than previously projected. The Commission was less optimistic for the subsequent 4 years
and projected slightly slower growth.
The CEFC has been asked to
expand the number of economic variables that it forecasts and provides to Maine
Revenue Services to incorporate in their tax models. A detailed list of these assumptions can be found in Appendix
A. The Revenue Forecasting
Committee directly adopted the Economic Commission's forecast and incorporated
these assumptions into its revenue forecasting models. The major economic growth assumptions underlying the
December 2004 revenue projections are as follows:
|
Summary
of Consensus Economic Forecasting Commission Economic Forecast |
||||||
|
Calendar Years |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
|
•
W&S Employment (Annual Percentage Change) |
|
|
|
|
||
|
> Consensus 2/2004 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
|
|
> Consensus 11/2004 |
0.9 |
1.7 |
1.5 |
1.1 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
|
> Incremental Change |
0.1 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
Summary
of Consensus Economic Forecasting Commission Economic Forecast (continued) |
|||||||||
|
Calendar Years |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
|||
|
•
Personal Income (Annual Percentage Change) |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
> Consensus 2/2004 |
4.0 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
|
|
|||
|
> Consensus 11/2004 |
5.5 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
|||
|
> Incremental Change |
1.5 |
-0.5 |
-0.5 |
-0.5 |
|
|
|||
|
•
CPI (Annual Percentage Change) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
> Consensus 2/2004 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
|
|
|||
|
> Consensus 11/2004 |
2.8 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
|||
|
> Incremental Change |
0.8 |
0.0 |
-0.5 |
-0.5 |
|
|
|||
B. Capital Gains Forecast
A major variable that is not
included in the economic forecast is a projection of net capital gains.
Maine’s exceptional capital gains growth during the stock market
“bubble” of the late 1990’s (in excess of 20% annual increases for 5
consecutive years through tax year 2000) came to an abrupt end in tax year 2001
plummeting 53.1%, resulting in a very unpleasant April surprise in 2002.
Capital Gains during the “bubble” were overly conservative with
respect to this variable, resulting in sizeable positive variances in the
Individual Income Tax line. While
Maine did have the direction right in 2001, the Committee did not anticipate the
extent of the reduction that was more than twice what the Committee had
forecast. The extent of the appreciation in the stock market and the
amount of income derived from capital gains significantly increased the
volatility of Maine’s already volatile General Fund revenue stream.
The Revenue Forecasting
Committee and Maine Revenue Services, like their counterparts in other states,
have had much difficulty trying to accurately forecast this variable.
Maine data is not captured at the state level and may only be accessed
through federal tax data. That
information is shared with Maine Revenue Services, but it lags by as much as 2
years. Since November 1999, Maine Revenue Services has been required
to provide a report on the net capital gains and losses realized by taxpayers
filing Maine individual income tax returns.
That report was initially reported to the Joint Standing Committee on
Appropriations and Financial Affairs and the Joint Standing Committee on
Taxation. Now, the report is
provided just to the Revenue Forecasting Committee, which includes this
information in its annual December report.
(Appendix D provides a copy of that report).
With the bursting of the
“bubble”, the extent of the individual income tax liability derived from net
capital gains has dropped down from its peak in 2000 of 17.5% to a level more in
line with historical patterns before the “bubble.”
The committee is now forecasting that taxes on net capital gains will be
in the 6.5% range for the foreseeable future.
The Table below presents some history and the current projections of net
capital gains that are factored into the forecast for the Individual Income Tax
line.
|
Maine
Resident - Net Capital Gains |
||
|
Tax
Year |
$
Millions |
Annual
Change |
|
1996 |
$799.7
|
45.0% |
|
1997 |
$1,218.7
|
52.4% |
|
1998 |
$1,551.0
|
27.3% |
|
1999 |
$1,867.2
|
20.4% |
|
2000 |
$2,360.3
|
26.4% |
|
2001 |
$1,108.0
|
-53.1% |
|
2002 |
$916.6
|
-17.3% |
|
December
2004 Projections |
||
|
2003 |
$1,001.7
|
9.3% |
|
2004 |
$1,056.8
|
5.5% |
|
2005 |
$1,099.0
|
4.0% |
|
2006 |
$1,143.0
|
4.0% |
|
2007 |
$1,188.7
|
4.0% |
|
2008 |
$1,236.3
|
4.0% |
|
2009 |
$1,285.7
|
4.0% |
C. Legislative Changes
The Revenue Forecasting
Committee bases the revenue forecast on current law.
The Committee does review the revenue derived from legislative changes.
While the Committee did make some small adjustments to the amounts
budgeted for General Fund revenue from enacted legislative changes, this
forecast is particularly affected by the shift of budgeted revenue from enacted
legislative changes. The table
below shows that the 121st Legislature enacted net budgeted increases
for the 2004-2005 biennium totaling $319.1 million in order to address the
General Fund structural gap and to address subsequent Medicaid/MaineCare
shortfalls. The one-time nature of many of those proposals is evident in
that the budgeted revenue from those same legislative changes that carry over to
the 2006-2007 biennium total only $146.4 million, a drop in revenue between the
biennia of $172.7 million.
|
Legislative
Changes Enacted by 121st Legislature |
||||
|
2003
and 2004 Legislative Sessions |
||||
|
Budgeted
Revenue ($'s in millions) |
||||
|
|
FY04 |
FY05 |
FY06 |
FY07 |
|
Net
General Fund Revenue from 121st Legislative Changes |
$183.5 |
$135.7 |
$73.3 |
$73.1
|
|
Biennial
Totals |
|
$319.1
|
|
$146.4
|
|
Change
from 2004-2005 to 2006-2007 Biennium |
|
|
|
($172.7) |
III. OVERVIEW OF REVENUE PROJECTIONS
This section provides narrative
descriptions of each of the forecasts of the major revenue sources of the
General Fund and Highway Fund and a summary of the outlook for the Fund for a
Healthy Maine. This report also
includes a projection of certain new taxes on health care providers that are set
aside as dedicated revenue for the Medicaid program.
The Tables in Appendix B provide some recent historical data of actual
revenue collections for each of these funds, a comparison by major revenue
source of actual FY04 revenue compared to final budgeted amounts, and a
comparison of current projections to revised projections for FY05 through FY09.
In these tables, the General Fund “Other Revenue” component, which
has become a substantial and largely unexplained piece, has been broken out into
some categories for the first time to help explain the forecast of “Other
Revenue” in the General Fund. The
amounts in the tables in the narratives that follow may not add due to rounding.
A. General Fund
|
General Fund ($'s in millions) |
|||||
|
|
FY05 |
FY06 |
FY07 |
FY08 |
FY09 |
|
Previous
Budgeted Amount |
$2,651.6
|
$2,669.9
|
$2,783.7
|
|
|
|
Net
Change from Current Forecast |
$72.0
|
$49.2
|
$45.0
|
|
|
|
Revised
Amount |
$2,723.6
|
$2,719.1
|
$2,828.6
|
$2,918.0
|
$3,022.8
|
|
Annual
% Growth |
1.5% |
-0.2% |
4.0% |
3.2% |
3.6% |
The projections of major sources of General Fund revenue are summarized
in the following as narrative descriptions of the major assumptions and unusual
legislative changes that affected the revenue stream.
Sales and Use Tax
|
Sales and Use Tax ($'s in millions) |
|||||
|
|
FY05 |
FY06 |
FY07 |
FY08 |
FY09 |