Skip Maine state header navigation
Skip First Level Navigation | Skip All Navigation
|Home | Contact Us | GeoPortal||
Site Map |
May 16, 2007 Meeting Minutes and Agenda
Approval of the March 21 st meeting minutes - Chair
Financial - Dan Walters
Policy & Marketing - Marilyn Lutz
Technical - Will Mitchell
Status on the GEOPortal - Will
Guidelines for Portal Administrator - Marilyn
Orthoimagery Project / Purchased ortho products- Larry Harwood
Parcel Grants - Larry
Geolibrary Funded Grants
Linking registries to GIS - Bill Hanson
Additional funding of CAT 3 grant
GIS Stakeholders Group
Jim Page, Chair
Marilyn Lutz, Co-Chair
Will Mitchell ( by phone )
Ken Murchison ( by phone )
William Hanson ( by phone )
Ray Halperin, former Board member
Matt Davis, ESRI
The meeting was called to order at 10:13
1. Approval of the April 18, 2007 meeting minutes
The Chair entertained a motion to approve the minutes. One change was suggested. Under section 3, the first bullet should read "Geolibrary will contribute $15,000 in cash match "
Liz Hertz moved to approve the minutes as revised with Gretchen Heldmann seconding. The Board voted unanimously in favor. The motion carried.
2. Subcommittee Reports
The Chair gave a brief explanation and history of the three standing committees, Financial, Technical and Planning, for the benefit of the new members. In summation, the Financial Committee is quiescent as most of the available funding being spent of encumbered, but should become more active as we need to approach the legislature again. The Policy Committee is working thru a list of policy documents on a long term basis. The Technical Committee is heavily involved with the developing GeoPortal. The minutes may reflect more history and detail than normal on some matters due the attendance of these new members.
The Chair cited the major items of funding remaining. Of the original $2,300,000 in bonds, $1,717,235 has been spent, $497,281 has been encumbered by contract leaving $85,483 still under consideration. Of that amount, $25,000 is still nominally under consideration for Standards conformity & data validation tools. There was a question on the accuracy of the $300,000 cost of the orthoimagery creation. The reply was that this was a best estimate and probably very close.
Policy & Marketing
There was little to further report on the principal current task of the Policy Committee which is the document Policy on Dissemination of Geospatial Data: Fee Setting. Marilyn Lutz explained the work of the Policy Committee and its difficulties in attempting to do so. A more pressing policy issue is the Memorandum of Agreement ( MOU ) between the Geolibrary and the comparatively new GIS Stakeholders group. Marilyn, Dave Blocher, Dan Walters and Jim Page agreed to work on the new MOU. Dave reported that the Stakeholders Charter document had been completed. They will try to have the MOU ready by next month.
The Chair explained the history of the GIS Executive Council which for years represented the interests of several state agencies that make use of GIS technology. The Geolibrary focus has been on the general public and private sector use of GIS. The Executive Council began with those state agencies signing Service Level Agreements to fund MEGIS operations. It evolved into a confederation of agencies guiding state GIS development. Funding now being provided by appropriation, the GIS Stakeholders is a further evolution of the group and serves in an advisory capacity to the Chief Information Officer.
Larry Harwood and the Chair explained the municipal parcel data grants. The grants were in 2 separate rounds and the grants themselves were of 2 types. Rapid Grants were reimbursements of up to $1,000 for conversion of existing digital parcel data to state standards. Standard Grants were payments, per parcel, up to a maximum of $10,000 per town for creation and/or upgrading of the spatial accuracy of digital parcels. There have been a number of contract extensions. There have been 27 awards of rapid grants with one town declining and 47 awards of standard grants.
Orthoimagery Project.& Photo Products
There was nothing new to report on the orthoimagery; there have been no deliveries and no word on schedules. The aerial photo products were described as scanned tiff images of the actual negatives plus control information sufficient to create orthorectified or stereometric products from the images. All products have now been delivered.
Status on the GEOPortal .
Will Mitchell reported that a new test site for the updated GeoPortal will be running soon on the OIT test server platform. The thinking is that a final product is 2 to 3 months out at this point. On April 20, 2007 , the Technical Committee approved the latest GeoPortal design. This design was provided primarily by Sean Myers and the review was thru a CDM web E-room session. On May 4, 2007 , Ionic gave their response to the proposed GeoPortal design. The consensus was that this was not everything asked for but would be an acceptable next step with some requested changes.
There was some discussion of what the screens should look like and what could be realistically gotten from Ionic at this point in time. It was suggested that if the GeoPortal was functional and stable that might be all that could be asked. The Committee wants a "Build 3" as per the contract although that may be difficult. It was asked if the Geolibrary would own the application code; this was not certain. It was also asked whether or not the metadata administration module had been demonstrated; it has not been.
The Chair summed up by citing that progress has been made but certainly more work has to be done. The Committee needs a simple list of accomplishments and functions, perhaps just a few bullet points, to indicate "we are there" or "where we are" with the GeoPortal.
Guidelines for Portal Administrator .
There has been no progress to report on this item.
3. Geolibrary Funded Grants
Linking Registries to GIS
Bill Hanson reported that as a supplement to the Category 3 Grant he has investigated the possibilities of linking title transfers to geographic locations, i.e. tax parcels by unique identification numbers. As a theory this has been well received, particularly by the more technically advanced registries in Cumberland and Penobscot. Some registrars contacted were interested in a prototype program. He has asked the Title Standards Committee ( Maine Bar Assoc. ) if he can make a presentation at the next meeting in September. If he can get on the agenda this would be a short PowerPoint on the basic idea.
This got strong informal support from the Board. There was some discussion of what existing GIS softwares are in the county registries, the answer apparently being not many. Also discussed was the very eclectic nature of property descriptions from exact surveys to ancient descriptions. Bill will have a letter to the Title Standards Committee for review by the Board at the next meeting.
Additional Funding of CAT 3 Grant
The grant is approved and underway. The immediate need is for an RFP to get proposals form vendors. The Board can add to some of the parts of the grant, especially the revised strategic plan, standards and promotion. There appears to have been no provision yet for a pilot/promotional demo. There was also discussion of involving Tim Glidden at SPO as there might be a crossover from this grant to development tracking.
The Chair asked for volunteers for an ad hoc committee to work with Dan Walters on the grant. Greg Copeland, Marilyn Lutz, Bill Hanson and Nancy Armentrout agreed to help. The Chair, Ken Murchison and Will Mitchell noted that they will have to recuse themselves from voting on the RFP due to potential conflicts of interest.
4. GIS Stakeholders Group
This item was not discussed and tabled to the next meeting.
5. Geolibrary Funding
The Chair gave an update on the recent attempts to acquire additional bonding and suggested new members review the last Annual Report to the legislature. The bond approach having yielded nothing, the Board must have recourse to the legislative approach. It will be necessary to make an organized effort to get legislators to support the Geolibrary. The Board needs to map a strategy for the next legislative session. The idea will be to identify a small number of key legislators willing to work towards funding the Geolibrary. The Chair suggested that everyone try to come up with the names of 1 or 2 legislators that might be thus favorably disposed. It was also noted that the CAT 3 grant might be part of the effort to get funding.
There was a short non sequitor discussion of possibly relaxing the state standards for digital parcel data. This might increase the data holdings by creating a second level tier of parcel data not as good as the standard but sufficient for many needs. Ken Murchison and Larry Harwood agreed to see what they could come up with.
Meeting Adjourned 12:30
|Copyright © 2011 All rights reserved.|