Skip First Level Navigation | Skip All Navigation
![]() |
| DEP Home | Contact Us | Subject Index | Can't Find It | About DEP |
|
Air Home >
Air Toxic Monitoring Program > Air Toxics & Hazardous Air Pollutants > Rumford HAPS Study
Draft Rumford Air Toxics Monitoring ReportThe Maine DEP has published a draft air toxics monitoring report for public comment. The report is entitled, "Maine DEP’s Ambient Air Toxics Monitoring Program in Rumford/Mexico, Maine1997 – 2003, Revision of October 28, 2004." (Adobe PDF, 1.5 Mb). Comments should be filed by January 15, 2005 in order to be fully incorporated into the final document. Electronic comments are preferred. Comments should be directed to David Wright at: E-mail: david.w.wright@Maine.gov Mail: MEDEP – BAQ Abstract of the Draft Rumford HAPs Report This report contains the results of MEDEP’s detailed Air Toxics monitoring program in the Rumford area from late 1997 until 2003. During this time, MEDEP collected three, 24-hour samples every six days at three sites, until the summer of 1999, when MEDEP scaled back to one long-term trend site. Monitoring locations were established in likely areas of high impacts from a local paper mill. The study site is located in a valley with complex meteorology, making it impossible to establish a “background” monitoring site. Samples were collected and analyzed for select Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) using EPA method TO-15. Method TO-15 contains many protocols to ensure that results accurately represent ambient concentrations of the pollutants that were monitored. Samples from collocation sites showed good replicate precision for most parameters. Sample results were averaged, and compared to ambient air quality guidelines (AAQG). The results show that benzene levels posed a greater than acceptable cancer risk. That is, the incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) was in excess of 10 in a million. Four other compounds likely exceed acceptable health risk levels: 1,3 butadiene; tetrachloroethene; carbon tetrachloride; and 1,2-Dibromethane. Twenty-six (26) compounds were determined to not pose a significant risk to public health. MEDEP was not able to determine the risk posed by air toxics that were not monitored for, the risk posed by 23 compounds that were sampled for but that lack risk-based ambient air guidelines, and for 14 compounds whose detection limits are too high to enable measurement down to their low ambient air guideline levels. Of particular concern are acrolein; 1,4 dichlorobenzene and 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane, which have high detection limits, but were occasionally detected well in excess of their respective AAQGs. Chloroform concentrations have decreases from the levels that were detected in the earliest sampling efforts in the area, to levels that do not pose a risk. Data Set
|
| Copyright © 2005 All rights reserved. |